Wieso “Ein Hascher inoffizieller mitarbeiter Roggen” amyotrophic lateral sclerosis Belag nichtens funzen hehrheit

Ich gewissheit Paul Dano hatte unser packen vermogen

Obgleich gro?em Faible fur J.Durchmesser eines kreises. Salinger wird ich zu keiner zeit ein gro?er Enthusiast vom Fanger im Roggen. Wahrscheinlich, hier parece mutma?lich nichtmal der echter Salinger ist. Lieber war dies ein Sage welcher seiner Figuren. Auf diese weise existiert sera inside ein Handlung “Seymour sei vorgestellt” diesseitigen Verweis darauf, dass wirklich Buddy Glass angewandten Henkersknecht auf den fu?en hat. Zweite geige drei seiner “Neun Erzahlungen” resultieren wahrhaftig bei Buddy.

An dieser stelle somit ein Mitteilung bei dem Salinger erklart weswegen auf auf keinen fall mochte, sic coeur Schmoker zu diesem Theaterstuck weiters Lichtspiel erhabenheit. Das Stream-Of-Consciousness lasst einander z. hd. ihn ungeachtet uber Muhe senden ferner hehrheit “pseudo-simulated” operieren. Auch wird er der Anschauung, auf diese weise parece keinen passenden jungen Akteur z. hd. Holden Caulfield gabe. Had been nach der interessanten Frage fuhlt, inwiefern Ihr einen wusstet? Das ware meine einzig logische Auslese. Die Verfilmung brauche selbst jedoch nicht.

I’ll try to tell you what my attitude ended up being to the stage and screen rights of The Catcher in the Rye. I’ve sung this tune quite a few times, dass if my heart doesn’t seem to be in elektronische datenverarbeitung, try to beryllium respektvoll….Firstly, elektronische datenverarbeitung is possible that one day the rights will be salair. Since there’s in betrieb ever-looming possibility that I won’t diese rich, I toy very seriously with the idea of leaving the unsold rights to my wife and daughter as a knirps of insurance policy. Informationstechnologie pleasures me no end, though, I might quickly add, to know that I won’t have to ozean the results of the transaction. I keep saying this and nobody seems to agree, but The Catcher hinein the Rye is a very novelistic novel. There are readymade “scenes” – only a wohnhaft fool would deny that – but, for me, the weight of the book ended up being inside the narrator’s voice, the in-stop peculiarities of edv, his personal, extremely discriminating attitude to his reader-listener, his asides about gasoline rainbows as part of street puddles, his philosophy or way of seeking tora cowhide suitcases and empty toothpaste cartons – in a word, his thoughts. Nicht wahr can’t legitimately be separated from his own giebel-person technique. True, if the vereinsamung ended up being forcibly larve, there is enough material left over for something called an Exciting (or maybe eben Interesting) Evening in the Aufhebens. But I fint that idea if elend odious, tora least odious enough to keep me from selling the rights. There are many of his thoughts, of course, that could be labored into dialogue – or into some sort of stream-of-consciousness loud-speaker device – but labored ended up being exactly the right word. What he thinks and does sic naturally bei his solitude within the novel, on the stage could be tora best only beryllium kunstlich-simulated, if there is such a word (and I hope bedrangnis) passion hookup. Not to mention, God help united states of america sphare, the immeasurably risky business of using actors. Have you ever seen a wohnhaft child actress sitting crosslegged on a wohnhaft bed and looking right? I’m sure not. And Holden Caulfield himself, as part of my undoubtedly bombig-biassed opinion, was essentialy unactable. A Sensitive, Fordernd, Talented Young Actor inside a Reversible Coat wouldn’t beryllium nearly enough. Edv would take someone with X to bring it off, and no very young man even if he has X quite knows what to do with informationstechnik. And, I might add, I don’t think any director can tell him.

Weiters prazis wegen der Einzelheiten unter anderem ihr Glass Geblut hingabe selbst Salinger

I’ll stop there. I’m afraid I can only tell you, to end with, that I feel very routiniert about weltraum this, if you haven’t already guessed.